Exposing the Subtle and Blatant Ways in Which the Media Seeks to Denigrate, Humiliate, and Ultimately Exterminate People of European or Caucasian Descent, One Image at a Time.
This troll-like, soft white guy has his white offspring to protect, but how can he offer protection to his genetic descendants when he can't even drive down an empty freeway without rear-ending what looks to have been the only other vehicle in a 50-mile radius? And of course the victim of this white guy's stupidity is a large, competent, smiling black guy. While the black guy knows exactly what insurance agency to call, and gets immediate results from a broadly smiling white matron, the white guy has to turn to his own elderly mother for help. Help me mommy!
It is as if the advertisers assume white society has been so degraded, so deracinated, that they won't mind seeing themselves depicted asunfit for life in the modern age while a black guy takes charge effortlessly and effectively.
Par for the course, eh? I know FedEx is a private company. But you would think they were actually part of the federal government considering their constant Anti-White propagandizing. I saw this one in an airport. It aired during Melissa Harris-Perry's show on MSNBC, as if they knew that the vast majority of their television audience would be sympathetic to its Anti-White politics.
Observe how in-charge the black guy is in a room full of women and men of various races. He just happens to zero in on the reasonably attractive, though mousy and frail-looking white woman for particular praise. Look how this sets her in raptures, leading white women everywhere to think that black guys are naturally on their side, looking out for their interests, looking for ways to bolster their self-confidence. Meanwhile, this ad's only white guy is a pathetic waste of space and borderline retarded. Look how he not only writes, but essentially speaks in ALL CAPS, as if to drive home the message that he is socially awkward, a pariah, an organism to be shunned. His request "HEY DO YOU WANNA GET A DRINK LATER?" does several things simultaneously: it shows how heis not really serious about his job; it makes him look desperate for camaraderie, as if he lives in his mother's basement and is thus overly eager to find friends; and it puts in our minds what is implicitly in the minds of his colleagues, namely that the answer to his entreaty for companionship must be a resounding NO!
The other races look on him in amazement, as if to wonder how it ever was that white men like this essentially built civilization and everything in it. "Now that yo civilization is built and shit, white man, we's gonna take it from you and git all jiggy wid it and make you look like deh fool dat you is in the process." - signed, the Brown Horde and their white and joo enablers at FedEx. Boycott: FedEx
Sometimes media proves itself to be Anti-White by what it fails to do, rather than by what it does. When mass murderer Christopher Dorner killed Jeremiah MacKay last month, I noticed a suspicious lack of sympathy in the news media for the victim. There were no MSNBC interviews with MacKay's parents or wife; no close-ups on the dead man's 4-month old son in an effort to give that heart-warming human touch, build sympathy, or elicit tears. Of course, if MacKay had been black and Dorner had been white and had been on an Anti-Black killing spree, you had better believe there would have been vigils, memorials, and cries for "justice" for him. But Dorner was the black man. So rather than focus on justice for MacKay, the mediacouldn't help themselves; they had to protagonize the perpetrator; they had to tell his "story:" sure, Dorner was on an Anti-White killing spree, but was he justified? Did he have a legitimate greviance? Did he have a point, after all? Thus Dorner becomes the "hero" from Django Unchained!
Compare this to the automatic anti-George Zimmerman, pro-Trayvon Martin spin that came last year from CNN and MSNBC; their hoodie-wearing guests demonstrated whose side they were on. There were little montages of Trayvon looking sweet and innocent; there were cries for people to go out and buy Skittles as a sign of solidarity; there were shrines and memorials built in his honor.
MSNBC keepin' it realz on the Lawrence O'Donnell show.
Now, instead of shrines to MacKay, instead of a "million police-uniform march," we get Dorner the hero. "Racism is rampant in the LAPD! Let's investigate!" People who claim white genocide often cite the Geneva Convention's third definition, where genocide is: (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life
calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. Then they point out that these conditions have been institutionalized since the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. I agree with this assessment. But when stories like the Dorner murders receive such Anti-White spin, I would be inclined to find the media complicit in the Geneva Convention's first definition: (a) Killing members of the group. At some point, some white guy out there is going to pull a Dorner. He is going to go on a vigilante killing spree of blacks. And just as Dorner cited the "racism" in the LAPD as his justification, this white vigilante is going to release a manifesto that cites the oppression of whites by black criminals, gang-bangers, and "youth" everywhere.
While I am not condoning mass killing and think it is the wrong way to bring about one's political objectives, still, I recognize that such a white vigilante would, statistically speaking, have more justification in his vigilantism than Dorner had; blacks kill whites far more often than whites kill blacks. But just imagine the demonization this hypothetical white vigilante would receive in the Anti-White media!
Here is a Superbowl ad by Jeep that was seen by millions. Seems pretty innocent, pretty feel-good, right? How could one have a problem with these teary-eyed sentiments? But the over-the-top emotional appeal here makes it one of the most effective and insidious Anti-White ads we have seen. For what do we take away from an ad like this? We get the fact that families love their family members. We get it. Pretty indisputable. But this natural, instinctive desire to protect loved ones here gets used as a weapon against--against what?--against our natural, instinctive desire to protect loved ones! For the overuse of mixed racial imagery here implies that we need to feel protective feelings for not just members of our own family and our own race, but for all races who march under the Stars and Stripes. We are, after all, according to Jeep, UNITED! And precisely how are we united? We are united not by blood, but by virtue of our falling within the arbitrary and artificial borders of a political entity that is caught up in a media-driven expansionist agenda in the Middle East! That is what unites us gawd-damn it! Does anyone else out there gag at the cynical opportunism of this corporation trying to play our emotions like a fiddle? Does anyone out there cringe at the Oprah voice trying to get our nads all juiced up with weepy "feel!" imperatives? And of course the black woman gets the hero close up at the end. It captures the whole of the new religion's morality play: put aside your reservations, whitey. Don't fight it. As long as you are worshiping black faces, you can call yourself morally superior and then, without a guilty conscience, be shipped off to faraway North Africa and the Middle East and kill some poor sods for your Neocon and Neo-Liberal globalist overlords. Boycott: Jeep
Here's the latest genocidal propaganda disguised as a commercial from State Farm. This one makes their prior attempt look positively philo-caucasian in comparison.
Ah! The smugness of this African techno-wizard as he (mere happenstance!)encounters a gorgeous blond!And even postauto accident he's still looking composed and suave!
Note the scripted ease with which he falls into an interpersonal chemistry with the meek and naive Nordic goddess, as when they say "the internet" simultaneously at :15.
Now contrast this with the white guy, who lookspositively subhuman as he grabs the delicious maiden with his gummy dead arms.
While the black guy uses his smartphone to "diagram" his accidents, thus using technology in a constructive, truth-seeking way, the white guy only uses the techno tools ofsocial media to falsely advertisea self that is severely lacking.
The take-away meme here is that white guys are genetically inferior losers who must not be mixed with. Only a pathetic, non-self-respecting, easily hoodwinked, non-hip-to-the-twenty-first-centurywoman would find herself paired up with one of these white genetic cul-de-sac tidepools.
Damnz. She shoulda stayed wifdatsophisticated black polymath! Boycott: State Farm.
WHAT THE MAKERS OF THIS AD WANT US TO THINK: Oh
look at those poor, disadvantaged, oppressed
minorities! Poor them. They're suffering. Their poor schools are so
riddled with violence and it's all our fault because we haven't yet
voted away our rights to own guns. But look at how soulful and real
these brown faces are, how vibrant, how "street." We can learn so much from
them - we square, suburban, privileged, whites. If only we had left these
noble, perfect, flawless, dark tribes alone instead of decimating
them with our guns and our drugs and our germs and our gods! We owe it
to them to
give them California! We owe it to them to cleanse the violence and the gang warfare from the
schools we built for them. We owe it
to them to end our evil, white, gun-loving ways and vote for our own
disarmament, for their benefit. Because, hey, once these kids are edjumakated, they're our future! And what a great future it looks to be, filled with these soulful kids who know how to keep it real, yknowhatmsayin'? Maybe some day they can rap for me their cool flows as they push my wheelchair down the halls of the sad nursing facility in which my white corpse will surely rot. I had better do right by these kids. They are, after all, you'll remember, our future. My future.
WHAT MOST NORMAL WHITE PEOPLE THINK: This is the fate of California. My race is so clearly getting genocided
there. The last thing I would want to do, especially after viewing this, is give up my guns, because the
moment I do half the teens in this video are going to be jumping over
the fence into my backyard and trying to get their hands on my stuff. Funny: I don't remember needing to ban guns back when California was more white. Maybe there is a correlation between how many brown faces I am seeing here and how violent the schools of California have become. Inevitably the browning of society necessitates a big nanny state and the denial of freedoms once thought sacrosanct, like gun ownership. Why isn't there a white girl in this video? Usually most commercials bend over backwards to layer white girls
between lots of darker men. She could even have her arms draped around her Nigerian boyfriend as she implores me, through the screen, to see the light and change my political views. No?
I guess the producers of this ad knew that showing white females in this instance
would elicit the wrong response, an inconvenient response. After showing so many aggressive
browns, showing white girls would only remind the viewer of a good reason to keep their guns: to protect the latter from the former.
The city of Duluth, MN has a 90 percent white population. Apparently some have a real problem with this. Enter their city's self-righteous campaign to shame their population for being who they are. I love how I'm only 7 seconds into this and they're already contradicting themselves. This girl says how "people see us, not a color." Meanwhile she's being singled out in this video, written upon, and interviewed for no other reason than her whiteness. The Mayor's office in Duluth is backing this genocidal tripe. How could Duluth's whites allow themselves to be subjected to such social-marxist, Frankfurt school joo-shaming? Call the Duluth Mayor's office and tell them you refuse to let them stigmatize and shame you for being white. The guy at :21 says "we're privileged because society was set up for us." He needs to clarify this: white people set up society in Duluth for themselves, just as most societies are set up by people for their own convenience. No group sets up their society in order to explicitly benefit some other, outside group. People in Japan over thousands of years set up societies that privilege Japanese. But none of the racially homogenous cities in Japan make videos bemoaning "Japanese privilege." None of the racially homogenous cities in Korea make videos bemoaning "Korean privilege." None of the racially homogenous cities in Madagascar or the Ivory Coast make videos bemoaning "Black privilege." It's Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians -- White countries for everybody! http://unfaircampaign.org/anti-racism-campaign-in-duluth-mn-launches-tuesday-jan-24/
Here are the Un-Fair campaign partners. Boycott them at will or just tell them what you think.
Central Labor Body
Churches United in Ministry (CHUM)
City of Duluth Mayor’s Office
City of Duluth American Indian Commission
City of Duluth Human Rights Commission
Clayton Jackson McGhie Memorial Inc.
Community Action Duluth
Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs
Lake Superior College
Life House
NAACP
St. Louis County Public Health and Human Services
University of Minnesota Duluth
University of Wisconsin Superior
YWCA
[Sorry again for the infrequent posts. It will pick up again eventually, as the media hasn't let up being Anti-White in the slightest. We're just backlogged with writing. Stay tuned!]
In the Olympic spirit, circa 2012, we would like to give you another heart-warming story of the best going for the gold.
But in this case, Aaron Cook, Britain's best, is being cut from the Olympic team because he is a "person without color."
As if that wasn't sufficiently tragic, none of the mainstream media outlets are covering the story honestly.
Note how in neither of these videos do the reporters mention the obvious: that Cook was disqualified because he is white? that he has been replaced with a black guy so that Brits can look more politically correct to the rest of the world?
So when do the British wake up to so many slaps in the face: when so many dusky-faced reporters tell them that their white star athletes are being replaced for no other reason than the color of their skin?
As a commenter on my Youtube channel said:
"must be that white privilege everyones talking about, lol"
But I called it. I knew the Olympic organizers for London 2012 wouldn't be able to promote an iota of nationalist sentiment, as we saw in Beijing. No. They would have to prostrate themselves before the New World Order, parade around their dread-locked eye-dolls like a multiCULTy Moloch!
But of course, according to Danny Boyle, Britain was ALWAYS multicultural. Did you see all those dusky 17th century agrarians? Proof!
My Filipino friend laughed out loud at this moment, captured in the video above. Of course casting was going to conjure up a pair of youthful, flirtsy blacks for us, with the girl a little light-skined in order to imply subtly a bit of miscegenation in her past and our future.
It's just a tiny flirtatious moment--and yet it becomes the front-and-center focus of a (formerly) white nation's Olympic opening ceremony, normally the showcase through which a nation expresses its identity.
I guess this, then, is Britain's sense of self: dark faced people tussling over a cell phone. From Shakespeare and Thomas Tallis to this! Depressing. Why can't whites, especially in Anglosphere, see that their weird, dark fixations look strange to the rest of the world (as to my Filipino friend) for whom racial abasement is not (yet) a religious tenet?
And religious it is, shown here, with a chorus line of whites, arms a-sway in raptures of devotion.
[Sorry for the extra long lapse. I was on the road and burdened by other writing projects. Please be patient if I fall off the radar from time to time!]
Another great find from one of our sharp-eyed contributors. We have often maintained that these subtle commercials are sometimes more poisonous than the more explicit ones because they creep under our radar and poison the well of our unconscious minds.
Does anyone think these memes are accidental when they play out identically in two separate videos? Sure, at first glance these ads might just look to be mocking stupid white men. But you'll notice more going on if you are attentive.
Watch the weird placement of the black guy and blonde white woman in the first video, above. Though physically they are spaced a few feet apart, the camera angle makes it look like they are meshed into each other. At :04, when the black guy leans up against the car, he seems to lean into the white woman. They share the center of the frame together.
Now pause at :05. Look at the black guy's hand, which is coolly leaning on the windshield of the car. From the angle of the camera, it actually looks like it is draped across the blond woman's waist, touching her just above her vaginal area. Again and again they use this this angle (at :15 and :20). Eventually it looks like he's caressing her.
Any accident, this pairing? this juxtaposition of black man on white woman while a white guy is made to look like a fool? If you think it is just my own paranoia, check out video two, below.
Again the white guy is depicted as foolish while the cool black guy and white woman pair up. Again at :04 they are integrated into each other. The white woman looks back at the black guy, as if for reassurance. Again at :05 they are leaned into one another. At :14 they simultaneously shake their heads disapprovingly. In other words, they team up, gang up in rejection of the white male dolt.
Funny how the people who produced this ad think you white fokes gonna go out git yerselves a brand new Chevy like the brainwashed pathetic sheep you are.
